24/7 Emergency Response +55 11 99499-4141
Corvaden

Photographs of hulls prove nothing. What a superintendent needs from a contractor’s project list is whether the work resembled his job, how long it took from instruction, and what happened when the scope moved.

Corvaden publishes all three. Where a job produced a variation, the variation is in the case study. Three well-documented projects are worth more than ten that describe a vessel and a month.

Published for every project

  • Vessel — name or type, IMO where the owner permits it
  • Location — port, country, and whether the work was afloat, in dock or under way
  • Scope — what was actually done
  • Challenge — the condition and the commercial constraint
  • Corvaden response — what was proposed, and on what evidence
  • Execution — crew, method, permits, testing
  • Result — the outcome, including variations
  • Duration — mobilisation through to completion

No case studies published yet

  • Completed projects with vessel, location, scope, duration and outcome
  • Owner consent to publish, and whether the vessel may be named
  • Photography from the job — as found, in progress, as repaired

The section is built and the template is complete. It is not being padded with work that has not been done, and it will stay empty until there is something real to put in it. In the meantime the engineering pages set out what Corvaden executes and how we work sets out the scope boundaries that apply.

Response in 6 hours. Mobilisation in 48 hours.

Send the repair specification, the class report and photographs with the first enquiry. Scope confirmed against documents is scope that does not change on arrival.

Response
6 h
Mobilisation
48 h